Denver Law Firm Ridley, McGreevy, Winocur & Weisz, P.C.
Law Firm Home Page Attorney Profiles Criminal Defense Civil Litigation Appeals Locations Contact Us

Law Articles

Attacking a State of Colorado Grand Jury Indictment
by Attorney Barrett Weisz

Criminal charges in Boulder and the other state courts of Colorado are brought by filing a criminal complaint or by an indictment issued by a grand jury.  Although the many state criminal charges like sexual assault, domestic violence, or DUI are brought by complaint, Boulder prosecutors will occasionally seek an indictment from a grand jury for theft, drugs, and other crimes.  An indictment is subject to a variety of attacks by a criminal defense attorney that can result in the charges being dismissed. 

An indictment that does not meet the legal requirements of C.R.S. § 16-5-201 can be dismissed upon a motion by a criminal defense lawyer.[1]   Every indictment must name the person charged, state the date and place of the crime, and whether the crime alleged is drugs, theft, or some other crime.[2]  The crime charged must be stated in terms of the criminal law  defining the crime or in a manner that is easily understood by the jury.[3] 

Lack of probable cause for the crime charged is the most common challenge to a grand jury indictment.  Colorado law allows a criminal defense attorney to challenge the grand jury's finding of probable cause.  Upon a motion by a criminal defense lawyer, the court must dismiss  criminal charges if, after reviewing the record of the grand jury proceedings, the court determines that the indictment is not supported by probable cause.[4]   In conducting the probable cause review the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution and if the testimony conflicts the court must draw an inference for the prosecution.[5] 

Indictments can also be attacked based upon the  prosecutor's misconduct during grand jury proceedings.  If a district attorney's conduct causes actual prejudice to the defendant or the misconduct compromises the integrity of the proceedings, the criminal charges must be dismissed.[6] Prejudice exists when the prosecutorial misconduct "substantially influenced the grand jury's decision to indict."[7]  Prosecutors can commit misconduct in a variety of ways.

For example, any person may submit a request to the prosecuting attorney to testify, re-testify, or appear before the grand jury.[8]  The prosecuting attorney is required to keep a record of when they deny such requests and the reason for the denials.[9]  If the prosecutor refused testimony without a valid reason and the offered evidence was potentially favorable to the defendant, a criminal defense attorney can seek dismissal based upon prejudicial prosecutorial misconduct.  Also, Colorado Rule of Criminal Procedure 6.5 allows the court to appoint a grand jury investigator, but the investigator is precluded from questioning witnesses or commenting, by word or gesture, on the evidence or witnesses.  The rule of grand jury secrecy can also provide a basis for a claim of prosecutorial misconduct.  When the prosecutor or his agents violate the secrecy requirements of Colorado Rules of Criminal Procedure. 6.2, and the defendant can demonstrate prejudice, a criminal defense lawyer should file a motion to dismiss the indictment.[10]

If a criminal defense attorney can convince the judge that the prosecutor who assisted the grand jury did so under an ethical conflict of interest requiring disqualification, the criminal charges may be dismissed.[11]  Disqualification is required when the prosecutor has a personal or financial interest in the criminal charges or if special circumstances exist that would prevent a fair jury trial for the defendant.[12]  To determine whether the grand jury prosecutor operated under a conflict of interest, a criminal defense attorney must find the same types of conflicts that prevent a prosecutor from handling a criminal case after charges are filed.

An attack upon the discriminatory selection of a grand jury may be brought under the Sixth or the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.[13]  The Sixth Amendment requires that the jury pool for a grand jury be selected from a fair cross section of the population that is served by the court.[14] Once the actual grand jury is selected, the composition of the seated grand jury can be challenged under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.[15]  No person may be excluded from serving as a grand juror because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, economic status or occupation.[16] 

If an individual is facing criminal charges in Boulder or elsewhere for sexual assault, domestic violence, drugs, theft or other crimes, an effective criminal defense lawyer will try to attack the indictment in the ways discussed in this article.[17]


[1]  People v. Westendorf, 542 P.2d 1300,1302 (Colo. App. 1975) (where indictment does not meet requirements of § 16-5-201, court lacked jurisdiction over defendant)

[2]  CRS § 16-5-201; People v. Thimmes, 643 P.2d 780 (Colo. App. 1981)(indictment charging defendant with theft by receiving was fatally deficient in failing to allege any date upon which alleged offense was committed).

[3]   Id.

[4]  CRS § 16-5-204(4)(k).

[5]  People v. Lutrell, 636 P.2d 712, 714 (Colo. 1981).

[6]  People v. Bergen, 883 P.2d 532, 543 (Colo. App. 1994); People v. Pickard, 761 P.2d 188, 194 (Colo. 1988). 

[7] Pickard, 761 P.2d at 195. 

[8]  CRS § 16-5-204(4)(l).

[9]  Id.

[10] Pickard, 761 P.2d at 194. 

[11]  People v. Hastings, 903 P.2d 23 (Colo. App. 1994)(when indictment obtained by prosecutor who is disqualified from conducting prosecution, it is invalid).

[12]  CRS§ 20-1-107(2).

[13]  Castaneda v. Partida, 430 U.S. 482, 492 (1977); Cerrone v. People, 900 P.2d 45, 53 (Colo. 1995).

[14]  Duren v. Missouri, 439 U.S. 357 (1979)

[15] Cerrone, 900 P.2d at 53; Castaneda, 430 U.S. 492.  Colorado has codified this requirement CRS § 13-71-104(3).

[16]  CRS § 13-71-104(3).

[17] This article is a modified version of an article published by Barrett Weisz in the Colorado Lawyer in 2005 titled "Grand Juries in Colorado: Understanding the Process and Attacking Indictments"

 

 

Criminal Defense Lawyers, Denver, CO
Lawyers in Denver Colorado